Phasic Kombatives Integrated

For Christmas I got an interesting present from a buddy - my very own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was completely composed by AI, with a couple of basic prompts about me provided by my friend Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty style of composing, however it's also a bit repeated, and really verbose. It might have exceeded Janet's triggers in collating data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a strange, repeated hallucination in the kind of my feline (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had offered around 150,000 personalised books, generally in the US, given that pivoting from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to generate them, based upon an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who produced it, can buy any more copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody developing one in anyone's name, consisting of stars - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book contains a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is fictional, produced by AI, and developed "entirely to bring humour and joy".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, but Mr Mashiach worries that the product is intended as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get sold even more.

He hopes to expand his range, producing various genres such as sci-fi, and perhaps providing an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted form of customer AI - selling AI-generated products to human consumers.

It's likewise a bit scary if, like me, you write for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to produce, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound just like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce similar content based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are discussing data here, we in fact imply human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is pictures. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were phony, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not believe making use of generative AI for creative purposes should be banned, however I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without consent need to be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be extremely powerful however let's develop it ethically and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually chosen to block AI designers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have decided to collaborate - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would enable AI designers to use developers' content on the internet to assist establish their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He mentions that AI can make advances in locations like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and messing up the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is likewise highly versus removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a great deal of joy," states the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening among its finest performing industries on the vague pledge of development."

A government spokesperson said: "No move will be made up until we are absolutely positive we have a useful plan that provides each of our objectives: increased control for ideal holders to assist them accredit their content, access to top quality material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for ideal holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI strategy, a national data library including public information from a large variety of sources will likewise be offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to increase the safety of AI with, amongst other things, companies in the sector needed to share details of the operations of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has now been rescinded by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is said to desire the AI sector to face less regulation.

This comes as a number of claims versus AI companies, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their approval, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of aspects which can make up fair use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it gathers training information and whether it should be paying for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to ponder, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its technology for a fraction of the cost of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's present dominance of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the moment, if I truly want a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weakness in generative AI tools for bigger tasks. It has lots of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be rather challenging to read in parts since it's so long-winded.

But offered how rapidly the tech is progressing, I'm not exactly sure the length of time I can remain confident that my significantly slower human writing and modifying abilities, kenpoguy.com are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest advancements in global innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents worldwide.

Outside the UK? Register here.